城乡梯度视角下京津冀地区棕地空间特征及再生策略研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目“国家公园候选区外围‘地-人-矿’冲突带棕地再生潜力评价与模式研究”(编号:52378061)


Spatial Characteristics and Regeneration Strategies of Brown elds in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Across the Urban-Rural Gradient
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    京津冀城市群正处于存量更新与生态修复的关键转型期,棕地治理已成为推动区域城乡融合的关键议题。既有研究多聚焦于微观修复技术,缺乏宏观空间梯度特征与中观治理分区的有效衔接。以京津冀城市群为研究对象,通过多源地理大数据构建城乡梯度综合指数(URGI),识别出城市核心区(L1)、近郊过渡区(L2)、县镇发展区(L3)、乡村农业区(L4)、生态涵养区(L5)5级梯度格局;结合景观生态学指数,定量解析工业、垃圾填埋场及矿山三类典型棕地在城乡梯度上的分布规律及景观格局差异;基于“空间压力-发展潜力”的双维评价模型,在乡镇尺度划定再生优先级分区,并提出重点治理、风险管控、生态修复、战略留白及自然恢复的差异化再生策略。京津冀棕地格局存在明显的梯度特征,工业棕地集聚于L1与L2,垃圾填埋场棕地散布于L2与L3,矿山棕地则主要分布于L4与L5 ;棕地景观形态沿城乡梯度呈现结构性分化,高梯度区表 现为大尺度与高破碎化并存,中低梯度区则趋于小尺度、分散化与边界复杂化,这一差异与再生路径选择密切相关;基于压力与潜力耦合的分区结果能够有效识别不同区域棕地的治理优先级与适宜策略类型。从城乡梯度视角揭示棕地空间分异机制,构建了由宏观空间格局识别向中观治理单元转译的技术路径,为京津冀国土空间精细化治理与城乡融合提供了决策依据。

    Abstract:

    [Background] As China’s urbanization shifts from gradual expansion to stock renewal, urban-rural integration has emerged as a crucial strategy to dismantle the dual structure. The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) urban agglomeration, recognized as a pioneering zone for Chinese-style modernization, faces a dual challenge in this transitional phase: reducing construction land in its core while curbing ineffi cient rural land use. Its widespread industrial, landfi ll, and mining potential brownfi eld sites represent underused land resources and may be associated with environmental risks, forming spatial barriers to urban-rural factor fl ows. Rather than isolated contaminated parcels, these brownfi elds are embedded in an urban-rural gradient along which population density, land-use intensity, and ecosystem service functions change continuously. Existing studies, however, concentrate on micro-scale remediation techniques and lack an eff ective pathway for translating macro-scale gradient patterns into meso-scale governance units. [Objective] This study focuses on the BTH urban agglomeration with the aim of identifying the regional urban-rural gradient. It seeks to characterize the spatial distribution and landscape morphology of three typical brownfi eld types—industrial, landfi ll, and mining—along this gradient. Additionally, it endeavors to develop a township-level priority governance evaluation model based on a “spatial pressure–development potential” matrix, in order to support ecological restoration and diff erentiated reuse of stock land resources. [Methods] A multi-source geospatial database integrated brownfi eld vector data with variables characterizing the urban-rural gradient. Potential brownfi elds were delineated by combining points of interest (POI) from Amap and Baidu Maps with areas of interest (AOI) from OpenStreetMap, then refi ned by visual interpretation of high-resolution imagery. Following a “socio-economic- physical environment” framework, fi ve variables were selected: nighttime light (NTL), gross domestic product (GDP), and population (POP) for the socio-economic dimension, and impervious surface area (ISA) and the normalized diff erence veg-etation index (NDVI) for the physical environment. Principal component analysis (PCA) reduced dimensionality, and its first component was taken as the Urban-Rural Gradient Index (URGI), discretized into fi ve levels (L1–L5) and aggregated to the township scale by area-weighting. Brownfi eld morphology was quantifi ed with three landscape indices: mean patch size (MPS), patch density (PD), and mean shape index (MSI). Finally, a two-dimensional “spatial pressure–development potential” model classifi ed township units to identify regeneration priorities and strategy types. [Results] (1) The fi ve-level gradient demonstrated a dense southeastern area and a sparse northwestern region. The urban core (L1) and peri-urban transition zone (L2) collectively accounted for only 11.37% of the total area, whereas the ecological conservation zone (L5) accounted for 37.30%. PCA corroborated the division, with PC1 and PC2 explaining 60.70% and 17.50% of the variance, respectively. (2) The distribution of brownfi elds exhibited a pronounced gradient eff ect: industrial brownfi elds were concentrated in L1 and L2, with L1 alone encompassing 670.37 km2, representing 88.11% of the brownfi elds within that level; landfi ll brownfi elds were dispersed across L2 and L3 in a bell-shaped distribution; and mining brownfi elds primarily characterized L4 and L5. Morphologically, high-gradient zones combined large, fragmented patches, whereas medium- and low-gradient zones displayed smaller, scattered patches with intricate boundaries. (3) Brownfi elds impacted approximately 52.67% of township units. The fi ve regeneration strategies—priority intervention, risk control, ecological restoration, strategic reservation, and natural recovery—constituted a continuous succession from intensive intervention to ecological preservation, refl ecting a progressive approach to land management. [Conclusion] This study delineates the spatial diff erentiation of brownfi elds across the urban-rural gradient, establishing an integrated analytical framework of “spatial-pattern identifi cation, morphological-characteristic analysis, and strategy-zone translation.” Three fi ndings stand out. First, the urban-rural gradient eff ectively recasts isolated brownfi elds as a single regional, structural issue. Second, observed morphological diff erences can inform the selection of site-level intervention approaches. Third, the theoretical strategy zones must be closely coupled with the diff erentiated land management policies of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei if they are to be operable in practice. Together, these fi ndings provide methodological support for refi ned territorial-spatial governance and urban-rural integration in the BTH Region.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

向双斌,朱敬源,郑晓笛. 城乡梯度视角下京津冀地区棕地空间特征及再生策略研究 [J]. 园林, 2026, 43 (8): 15-24. 复制

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-04
  • 出版日期: