山地城市生物多样性规划评估方法对比研究 ——以杭州临安区鸟类多样性为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


A Comparative Study on the Assessment Methods of Biodiversity Planning in Mountain Cities: Taking Bird Diversity in Lin’an District of Hangzhou as an Example
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    为深入了解人居环境发展与生物多样性保护之间的矛盾,有多种模拟数据评估方法被用于识别城市生物多样性富集区与敏感区。有研究显示数据InVEST模型方法和真实数据MaxEnt模型方法能相互弥补不足,为验证以上说法,选取典型山地城市——杭州市临安区为研究对象,采用模拟数据InVEST模型方法和真实数据MaxEnt模型方法对临安生境质量和鸟类潜在适生环境进行对比评价,并使用地理探测器识别其中的关键因子。结果显示,临安严重高估区域、高估区域、正常区域、低估区域、严重低估区域面积分别为233.9 km2、2 307.7 km2、438.1 km2、39.4 km2和2.4 km2,气候单因子具有较好的的显著性,且气候因子与环境因子的交互作用较为显著。通过对比发现,两个模型结果有较大差异,模拟数据InVEST方法较大程度高估了山地城市生境质量与鸟类潜在适生环境;真实数据MaxEnt模型方法结果显示临安鸟类的潜在适宜生存环境相对较差。由此可见,对山地城市生物多样性及生境质量综合评价可以采取此两种方法结合。未来应充分考虑环境因子和气象因子对山地城市生物多样性的影响,并建立适宜的生物多样性规划评估方法,以便进行有效的规划保护。

    Abstract:

    For understanding of the contradiction between living environment development and biodiversity protection, there are a variety of simulation data evaluation method is used to identify urban biodiversity enrichment area and sensitive area, studies show data InVEST model and real data MaxEnt model method can make up for the shortage of each other, to verify the above, this study selects typical mountain city, Hangzhou lin’an area as the research object, using simulation data InVEST model method and real data MaxEnt model method of lin’an habitat quality and birds potential suitable environment comparison evaluation, and using geodetectors to identify the key factors within them. The results showed that the areas seriously overestimated, overestimated, normal, underestimated, and seriously underestimated were 233.9 km2, 2 307.7 km2, 438.1 km2, 39.4 km2, and 2.4 km2, respectively. The climate single factor was relatively significant, and the interaction between climate factors and environmental factors was more significant. Through comparison, it was also found that the results of the two models differed significantly. The simulated data from the InVEST method greatly overestimated the mountain urban habitat quality and the potential suitable environment for birds; the real data from the MaxEnt model method showed that the potential suitable living environment for Lin’an birds was relatively poor.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

彭宇婷,胡文浩,申亚梅. 山地城市生物多样性规划评估方法对比研究 ——以杭州临安区鸟类多样性为例 [J]. 园林, 2025, 42 (8): 70-77. 复制

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-08-06
  • 出版日期: