Given that residents are frequently passively exposed to this environment, there exists a deficiency in a systematic explanationregarding the measurement of green exposure on urban streets, its impact on health, and its associated health benefts. By employing the CiteSpace tool alongside bibliometric methodology, we conducted quantitative analyses and qualitative summariesof both domestic and intermational studies, systematically categorizing research themes, hotspot developments, and principalfndings. The study identifed that contemporary techniques for quantifying green exposure in urban streets predominantly comprise field observation, image analysis, and subjective perception assessment. Health benefts can be evaluated through self-assessment scales, physiological indicators, behavioural observations, activity data. clinical diagnoses, and medical records, Thesebenefits manifest in psychological, physiological, and social health. These health pathways are primarily realised through im.proving the ecological environment, promoting physical activity, enhancing psychological resilience, and strengthening socialinteraction. Current research still faces problems such as insuficient interpretation of physiological-psychological mechanismsunclear delineation of street scales, and a lack of evaluation of multi-sensory experiences. Future research should focus on thecoupling mechanism between ecological and psychological benefits, integrate analyses of the spatial and temporal dimensionsof heterogeneity, and explore differences in health benefits between episodic exposure and active use to support the accuratedesign of health-oriented urban streets.