上海近代公园的纪念意义转变与空间重塑
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


The Transformation and Spatial Reconstruction of Commemorative Significance in Shanghai Modern Parks
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    从纪念的根本内涵出发,运用阿洛伊斯·里格尔“有意为之的纪念物”和“历史纪念物”的概念进行阐发,通过分析上海近代公园中的纪念性空间,比较两种空间类型的产生、优劣以及相互转换,解读其在保护更新历程中表现出来的“符号性纪念意义”和“本体性纪念意义”,界定并辨析两种意义在公园变迁中的形成及特点。以复兴公园和霍山公园为例,分析设计方案的前后变化及原因、设计意图与实际操作的差异等内容,论述两种意义在具体更新中的转变和重塑空间的过程。两种意义的区分和解读既可以拓展“纪念”在历史公园保护和更新中的作用,也能帮助厘清公园中值得保护和更新活化的内容。历史公园作为一种历史公共空间,记录着社会群体的集体造园历史和使用公园的痕迹,这种记录帮助后人构建起对公园的历史认识,于是产生了本体性意义;历史公园同时也延续着历史上的人、事、社会生活的记忆,为了满足人们延续记忆的精神需求而产生符号性意义,两种意义在公园中是不可分割相辅相成的。在公园更新中强化符号意义可以增强人们对公园的记忆,但同时应该保存物质本体作为历史延续的稳定基础;而在强调物质保存的个案中,不能陷入固定和僵化,应该积极挖掘本体潜存的符号纪念意义,激发公园活力和新的纪念空间的诞生。

    Abstract:

    Starting from the fundamental connotation of commemoration, the concept of “intentional monuments” and “historical monuments” of Alois Riegl is used to interpret and analyze the monumental spaces in Shanghai’s modern parks, comparing the emergence, strengths, weaknesses, and interconversion relationship of the two types, interpreting their “symbolic commemorative significance” and “ontological commemorative significance” in the process of conservation and renewal, and defining and identifying the characteristics of their formation. Taking Fuxing Park and Huoshan Park as examples, this paper analyzes the changes in the project process, the difference and reasons between the design intention and the actual operation, and discusses the transformation of the two significance in the specific transformation and the spacial reconstruction. This paper argues that the distinction and interpretation of the two significance can expand the role of commemoration in the conservation and renewal of historical parks and further understand and clarify the contents worthy of conservation, renewal, and activation. As a kind of historical public space, historical parks record the collective history of social groups in the creation of parks and the traces of their use, and this record helps future generations to build up a historical understanding of parks, thus giving rise to ontological significance; historical parks also perpetuate the memory of people, events and social life in history, generating symbolic significance in order to satisfy this spiritual need. The two significance are inseparable and complementary in the park. Strengthening symbolic significance can enhance people’s memory of the park, but at the same time, the material ontology should be preserved as a stable foundation for historical continuation; while in cases where material preservation is emphasized, it should not fall into fixation and rigidity, and should actively explore the potential of commemorative significance from material history, stimulate the vitality of the park and the birth of new commemorative spaces.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

麦璐茵,周向频,陈路平. 上海近代公园的纪念意义转变与空间重塑 [J]. 园林, 2022, (10): 52-60. 复制

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-10-25
  • 出版日期: